If your question is about how do I handle the problem personally, I usually endeavor to minimize my usage with the phrase "that" in order to prevent these situations completely.
I'm used to declaring "I am in India.". But somewhere I saw it stated "I'm at Puri (Oriisa)". I would like to know the variations involving "in" and "at" while in the above two sentences.
It's a pity that Google search does not direct me to any valuable page about "that which". Can someone explicate its grammar for me?
i meant like if its typed and we gotta browse it out, is there like an official pronunciation for it..? i'd considered I would in all probability study it "and slash or" which of course doesn't sound official whatsoever
The confusion is drastically exacerbated by mathematicians, logicians and/or Computer system scientists who're very common with the distinctions concerning the reasonable operators AND, OR, and XOR. Namely, or
The construction that gets pronounced with /zd/ goes like this: A shovel is used to dig with. That's not an idiom, and never a constituent, possibly.
The phrasing exclusively reflects the relationship in between a term and what it represents. If you concur with the responses above that it looks like a forced attempt to audio erudite, then you could use for
How will be the Münchhausen trilemma not the biggest problem in meta-ethics and epistemology? more hot questions
The identical conduct could materialize with the additional "that" showing in your sentence. So although it'd be proper in idea, Potentially you could possibly reword your sentence this kind of that it turns into more readable to your audience.
In English "or" is generally taken to get exclusive or, if you want to specifically use inclusive or then use "and/or".
"I know that it is actually true" will become "I realize it is true." I simply omit the phrase "that" and it still works.
It's essential to log in to reply this question. Start asking to receive responses
If I wanted being completely unambiguous, I might say one thing like "must be delivered ahead more info of ...". On one other hand, sometimes the ambiguity is irrelevant, despite which convention governed it, if a bottle of milk explained "Best file used by August tenth", you couldn't get me to drink it on that date. TL;DR: it's ambiguous.
As for whether it's "official English" or not, I'd personally say that it is. It is used within the AP Stylebook, for example.